之前的mbti测试是isfp和esfp徘徊 

询问了chat gpt 4o ,是这样说的 :

Based on the scores from your image, here is an interpretation of your MBTI type:

– **Se (Extraverted Sensing): 37.0**
– **Si (Introverted Sensing): 27.5**
– **Ne (Extraverted Intuition): 35.0**
– **Ni (Introverted Intuition): 25.9**
– **Te (Extraverted Thinking): 28.0**
– **Ti (Introverted Thinking): 25.1**
– **Fe (Extraverted Feeling): 27.7**
– **Fi (Introverted Feeling): 33.9**

To determine your MBTI type, we can look at the highest scores in each of the dichotomies:

1. **Sensing (Se and Si) vs. Intuition (Ne and Ni)**
– Se (37.0) vs. Ne (35.0)
– Se (37.0) vs. Ni (25.9)

Your highest scores are in Se and Ne, indicating a preference for Extraverted Sensing (Se).

2. **Thinking (Te and Ti) vs. Feeling (Fe and Fi)**
– Fi (33.9) vs. Fe (27.7)
– Fi (33.9) vs. Te (28.0)

Your highest score is in Fi, indicating a preference for Introverted Feeling (Fi).

3. **Judging (Te and Fe) vs. Perceiving (Se and Ne)**
– Se (37.0) vs. Te (28.0)
– Se (37.0) vs. Fe (27.7)
– Ne (35.0) vs. Te (28.0)
– Ne (35.0) vs. Fe (27.7)

Your highest scores are in Se and Ne, which indicates a preference for Perceiving.

Given these preferences, the likely MBTI type for you is **ESFP** (Extraverted, Sensing, Feeling, Perceiving), since Se (Extraverted Sensing) and Fi (Introverted Feeling) are your strongest functions, with a perceiving preference.

**ESFP**s are known for being outgoing, energetic, and spontaneous. They enjoy living in the moment and are often seen as fun and enthusiastic individuals. They rely on their senses to gather information and use their personal values to make decisions.

根据您图像的分数，以下是对您的 MBTI 类型的解释：

– **Se（外向感觉）：37.0**
– **Si（内向感觉）：27.5**
– **Ne（外向直觉）：35.0**
– **Ni（内向直觉）：25.9**
– **Te（外向思考）：28.0**
– **Ti（内向思考）：25.1**
– **Fe（外向情感）：27.7**
– **Fi（内向情感）：33.9**

要确定您的 MBTI 类型，我们可以查看每个二分法中的最高分数：

1. **感觉（Se 和 Si）与直觉（Ne 和 Ni）**
– Se（37.0）与 Ne（35.0）
– Se（37.0）与 Ni（25.9）

您的最高分数是在 Se 和 Ne 方面，表明您偏好外向感觉 (Se)。

2. **思考（Te 和 Ti）与感觉（Fe 和 Fi）**
– Fi（33.9）与 Fe（27.7）
– Fi（33.9）与 Te（28.0）

您的最高分数是 Fi，表明您偏好内向情感 (Fi)。

3. **判断（Te 和 Fe）与感知（Se 和 Ne）**
– Se（37.0）与 Te（28.0）
– Se（37.0）与 Fe（27.7）
– Ne（35.0）与 Te（28.0）
– Ne（35.0）与 Fe（27.7）

您的最高分数是在 Se 和 Ne 方面，这表明您偏爱感知。

鉴于这些偏好，适合您的 MBTI 类型可能是 **ESFP** (外向、感觉、情感、知觉)，因为 Se (外向感觉) 和 Fi (内向情感) 是您最强的功能，具有感知偏好。

**ESFP** 以外向、精力充沛和随性著称。他们喜欢活在当下，通常被视为有趣而热情的人。他们依靠感官来收集信息，并利用个人价值观来做出决定。

根据chat gpt所讲，我最高的维度是Se和Ne，但是做题的话并没有那么准确。

结合某次isfp的测试结果

 

以下是转自quora的isfp和esfp区分理论

I decided to edit this for more elaboration.
我决定编辑此内容以进行更详细的说明。

ESFPs have dominant Se and inferior Ni while ISFPs have dominant Fi and inferior Te. So there are actually a few prominent differences that arise aside from E vs I.
ESFP 具有主导 Se 和次 Ni，而 ISFP 具有主导 Fi 和次 Te。因此，除了 E 与 I 之外，实际上还存在一些显着的差异。

For starters, ESFPs are more empirical, and ISFPs are more idealistic.
首先，ESFP 更注重经验主义，而 ISFP 则更理想主义。

As introverted feelers, ISFPs are primarily concerned with archetypes and classes of things, with the aim of evaluating those archetypes or forming wishes towards them, while as extroverted types, ESFPs are primarily concerned with individual things, per se examples, or “the” things, with the aim of experiencing those individual things and noticing the actual details of those individual things.
作为内向的触角，ISFP主要关注事物的原型和类别，目的是评估这些原型或形成对它们的愿望，而作为外向的类型，ESFP主要关注个体事物，本质上的例子，或“那个”事物，目的是体验这些个体事物并注意这些个体事物的实际细节。

Hence, in any situation, ESFPs are always paying attention to the apparent reality of the situation at hand, really taking in the experience of it and essentially remaining present, while putting less thought into their values and sort of letting their values work themselves out automatically. Their main focus is: What is noticeable about “the thing” or “the situation”.
因此，在任何情况下，ESFP 总是关注当前情况的表面现实，真正吸收经验并本质上保持在场，而较少考虑他们的价值观，并让他们的价值观自动发挥作用。他们的主要关注点是：“事物”或“情况”有什么值得注意的地方。

On the other hand ISFPs are always focusing on the *type* of situation that they’re dealing with, in principle, and refining their value-oriented judgments toward that archetype—what they like about it, dislike about it, wish of it, etc.—while paying less attention to the details of the actual situation at hand. Their main focus is, what they like/dislike/wish of “a thing like this thing” or “a situation like this” in principle.
另一方面，ISFP原则上总是关注他们正在处理的情况的“类型”，并针对该原型完善他们的价值导向判断——他们喜欢它、不喜欢它、希望它什么、等等——同时不太关注当前实际情况的细节。他们的主要关注点是，原则上他们喜欢/不喜欢/希望“这样的事情”或“这样的情况”。

This is why I say: ESFPs are more empirical, and ISFPs are more idealistic.
这就是为什么我说：ESFP更实证，ISFP更理想。

Furthermore, ESFPs prefer Te over Ni while ISFPs are the reverse.
此外，ESFP 更喜欢 Te 而不是 Ni，而 ISFP 则相反。

In this sense, ESFPs are more analytical and strategic, forming hypotheses and predictions about the situation at hand, while ISFPs are more visionary and contemplative, imagining new and deeper potentials of the *type* of situation at hand as a whole.
从这个意义上说，ESFP 更具分析性和战略性，对当前情况形成假设和预测，而 ISFP 更具远见和沉思性，从整体上想象当前“类型”情况的新的、更深层次的潜力。

So while it’s not their primary concern, ESFPs put some effort into forming hypotheses and making predictions about the situation at hand, while putting less consideration into what is possible, or what could be, really just letting their awareness of possible alternatives take care of itself, automatically. For ESFPs, possibilities really “just occur” to them, and they don’t really *try* to imagine them. They often feel like they have no control over their imaginations, or whether possibilities occur to them, but are a lot more comfortable with forming or refining their predictions/hypotheses about what actually, probably *is* as opposed to simply being aware of what *might be*.
因此，虽然这不是他们最关心的问题，ESFP 会花一些精力来形成假设并对当前的情况做出预测，同时较少考虑什么是可能的或可能是什么，实际上只是让他们对可能的替代方案的认识自然发生， 自动地。对于 ESFP 来说，可能性确实“只是发生”在他们身上，而且他们并没有真正“尝试”去想象它们。他们常常觉得自己无法控制自己的想象力，或者是否会出现可能性，但更愿意形成或完善他们对实际上可能“是什么”的预测/假设，而不是简单地意识到什么*可能*。

On the other hand ISFPs are more focused on being aware of possibilities, and again this focus is mainly on the *type* of thing or *type* of situation. What is possible of this *type* of thing/situation. They mainly try to just be aware of these potentials, while putting less consideration into what they actually predict or suspect, and really just let their gut take care of that all by itself. Just as ESFPs often feel like they have no control over their imaginations, ISFPs often feel like they have no control over their predictions or hypotheses—for the most part, their gut instructs them and they simply accept it. Unfortunately, their gut is not always right, and yet they still feel compelled by it. On the other hand they are a lot more comfortable envisioning new possibilities that others had never considered before, and may spend a fair amount of time trying to see new potentials for some archetype, or even imagine a new archetype of thing from the ground up.
另一方面，ISFP 更注重意识到可能性，而且这种关注主要集中在事物的“类型”或情况的“类型”上。这种*类型*的事物/情况有什么可能。他们主要试图意识到这些潜力，而较少考虑他们实际预测或怀疑的内容，实际上只是让他们的直觉自行处理这一切。正如 ESFP 经常感觉自己无法控制自己的想象力一样，ISFP 也经常感觉自己无法控制自己的预测或假设——在大多数情况下，他们的直觉告诉他们，他们只是接受它。不幸的是，他们的直觉并不总是正确的，但他们仍然感到被迫。另一方面，他们更愿意设想其他人以前从未考虑过的新可能性，并且可能会花相当多的时间尝试看到某些原型的新潜力，甚至从头开始想象事物的新原型。

通过这些理论 我发现有我仍一半属于isfp 一半属于esfp的特质

那我可以成为XSFP

虽然只是个标签 但我观察理智会区分仅仅是一个标签, 但是潜意识还是会潜移默化地让自己向这个标签靠拢和认同,所以分析还是很有必要的

虽然在mbti圈子里 有自己单一的mbti人格是正确的 ， 但我认为人的性格是复杂的，不仅仅是一个标签可以解释的，不认为有那么严格的划分